Say No to NAPLAN

A series of two-page papers, explaining the many problems with NAPLAN

These papers were compiled by the “Say NO to NAPLAN” group. Feel free to copy and distribute them with appropriate referencing.

Also, see a letter of support from 140 academics across the country.

 

PARENTS:  Your child does NOT have to do NAPLAN.
Download a flyer and a letter you can sign for the principal:  Flyer+parent letter

Related Stories

What kind of children will we get when we focus on performance rather than learning?

What kind of children will we get when we focus on performance rather than learning?

23 August 2017

Whitlam Institute, Western Sydney University, 23 August 2017.   In the Whitlam Institute's latest Perspectives paper, Prof Justine Grønbaek Pors explains research showing that standardised testing and educational rankings continue to have adverse effects on children and young people.  NAPLAN has moved us no closer to improved outcomes but has contributed...more»

Arts-based approaches to teaching literacy

Arts-based approaches to teaching literacy

7 August 2017

EduResearch Matters, 7 August 2017.  The focus on formal, regulated programs in reading and writing is having an enormous negative impact. There has been a narrowing of focus and a preoccupation with test results.  Read the article here...more»

Why don't journalists question the validity of NAPLAN data?
PISA scores decline after NAPLAN is introduced

PISA scores decline after NAPLAN is introduced

5 August 2017

David Hornsby, 5 August 2017.  The attached graph shows that PISA scores declined from the time NAPLAN testing began in 2008.  A coincidence, or another sign that we now teach to the NAPLAN test rather than the curriculum?...more»

The dark side of NAPLAN

The dark side of NAPLAN

4 August 2017

EduResearch Matters, 3 August 2017.  Has the test replaced the curriculum?  Read the article here...more»

NAPLAN is ten years old - so how is the nation faring?

NAPLAN is ten years old - so how is the nation faring?

2 August 2017

The Conversation, 2 August 2017.  Why is anyone surprised that NAPLAN results hardly change?  Students get better by being taught; not by being tested.  Use the money for teacher professional learning instead of wasting it on unreliable tests once a year.  Read the article here and also see the NAPLAN...more»

Private companies accessing student data fuels commercialisation fears

Private companies accessing student data fuels commercialisation fears

4 July 2017

The Age, 4 July 2017.  Private companies are gaining unprecedented access to students' data, drafting NAPLAN questions and producing teaching and learning materials, prompting fears that businesses are dictating the focus of public education and making millions.  (And the tests have not improved learning - surprise, surprise!)...more»

The silent tragedy of NAPLAN, students reported in misleading bands

The silent tragedy of NAPLAN, students reported in misleading bands

21 March 2017

Tulip Education Research Blog, 16 March 2017.  NAPLAN reporting of student abilities is unreliable.  The certainty of the "dots within the bands" is not matched by the maths. NAPLAN results don't include confidence intervals because then it would not be possible to locate a student in a particular band.  Read the article...more»

Setting up children to fail

Setting up children to fail

22 February 2017

RIP IT UP Reading, 22 Feb 2017.  A view of NAPLAN from a parent, educator and PhD candidate.  Read the article here  ...more»

Cold Distant Data: the great political deception and money waster

Cold Distant Data: the great political deception and money waster

20 February 2017

Protecting Childhood, 19 Feb 2017.  Data collection in schools to fulfil national standardised testing requirements is a wrong education driver.  Stop the paralysis by analysis!  Read the article here...more»

NAPLAN prepares us for neither the real world nor Trump

NAPLAN prepares us for neither the real world nor Trump

5 February 2017

The Age, 4 Feb 2017.  Trump instinctively knows that clearly set-out arguments don't persuade.  The method of argument required for students to succeed at NAPLAN doesn't work. We are going to need new techniques of telling the truth.  Read the article here...more»

So who says competition in the classroom is inevitable?

So who says competition in the classroom is inevitable?

30 October 2016

Lucy Clark, The Guardian, 10 Jul 2016.  – This is an extract from her amazing new book, "Beautiful Failures"  –  Highly Recommended.  Read the article here   Also recommended: Alfie Kohn's book, "No Contest."...more»

Four common claims about education funding and quality that need explaining

Four common claims about education funding and quality that need explaining

29 August 2016

The Conversation, 29 Aug 2016.  – Prof Alan Reid (University of SA) examines four common claims: (1) education funding has increased; (2) NAPLAN results have plateaued; (3) despite spending more money, education outcomes have not improved; (4) we need to focus on evidence-based measures that will get results for students.  A "must read"...more»

NAPLAN data is not comparable across school years

NAPLAN data is not comparable across school years

12 August 2016

The Conversation, 12 Aug 2016.  The test error of NAPLAN is too high and results cannot be compared across years. It is not reasonable for politicians to say that NAPLAN results have plateaued. The reliability of NAPLAN for charting individual student progress is also questioned. Read the article here...more»

Hope, engagement and wellbeing linked to students' success

Hope, engagement and wellbeing linked to students' success

10 August 2016

Sydney Morning Herald, 4 Aug 2016.   – Clearly, NAPLAN is not achieving what it set out to achieve (surprise, surprise).  It doesn't measure the more important things like hope and wellbeing, which are better predictors of graduation rates and academic success.  Read the article here...more»

NAPLAN meaningless as a test of creative writing skills

NAPLAN meaningless as a test of creative writing skills

10 August 2016

ABC News, 9 Aug 2016.  Best-selling children's book authors Andy Griffiths and Terry Denton have questioned the value of the NAPLAN test and it's ability to offer insights into kids' reading and writing skills.  Read the article here...more»

NAPLAN: true or false?

NAPLAN: true or false?

6 August 2016

Breaking Out Journal, August 2016.  A fact sheet relating to "true or false" statements about NAPLAN.  Read the article here...more»

Why we should continue to oppose NAPLAN

Why we should continue to oppose NAPLAN

5 August 2016

James Tonson, August 2016.  Reasons for ongoing opposition to NAPLAN relate to its classroom impact, what it represents in a policy context, the sense that many teachers feel unable to speak out against it, and an opportunity to engage parents and community in discussion and action about educational practice.  Read...more»

NAPLAN nasties

NAPLAN nasties

5 August 2016

This set of short papers, also on our NAPLAN page, is being reposted because current views expressed in the different media outlets show incredible ignorance about the huge problems with NAPLAN.  Read the papers here...more»

Interpreting NAPLAN results for the layperson

Interpreting NAPLAN results for the layperson

4 August 2016

Prof Margaret Wu (n.d.)  Students' NAPLAN scores can fluctuate by about ±12% because a sample of 40 questions is not sufficient to establish, with confidence, the exact proficiency of a student. Any measure of growth has an error margin greater than one year's growth. Wu also shows how NAPLAN results...more»

The NAPLAN trap

The NAPLAN trap

3 August 2016

The Guardian, 3 August 2016.  We won’t lift our overall achievement in Naplan or anything else until we lift the strugglers. And we won’t lift the strugglers until we properly target their schools and stop over-investing in schools which are already well-resourced.  Read the article here...more»

Dump NAPLAN: here's a better way to do our national testing

Dump NAPLAN: here's a better way to do our national testing

16 May 2016

Rachel Wilson, EduResearch Matters, 16 May 2016.  – The announcement by the coalition that it will extend the national assessment program to our very young school children in Year 1 makes me believe change is now imperative. Read the article here...more»

NAPLAN lies to parents and their teachers

NAPLAN lies to parents and their teachers

13 May 2016

www.mamamia.com.au,  10 May 2016.  NAPLAN, as a national assessment program, just doesn't work.  Read the article here...more»

NAPLAN's tale of two territories: why ACT and NT are on opposite ends of the spectrum

NAPLAN's tale of two territories: why ACT and NT are on opposite ends of the spectrum

8 August 2015

The Conversation, 6 August 2015.  – Many factors affect ability to perform on standardised tests, including isolation, language background, access to internet, parental income and parental education levels.  It's complex, and not helped by simplistic reporting of shaky NAPLAN data.  Read the article here...more»

Why NAPLAN is failing our kids

Why NAPLAN is failing our kids

8 August 2015

news.com.au, 7 Aug 2015.  – Some of the most important elements of a good education can't be measured by a test and NAPLAN does NOT identify identify issues in teaching programs or assist individual teachers.  Read the article here...more»

The latest NAPLAN results reveal the need for Gonski-style funding

The latest NAPLAN results reveal the need for Gonski-style funding

6 August 2015

The Age, 5 August 2015.   – NAPLAN testing does not, cannot and never was intended to measure student knowledge.  Read the article here...more»

Test misses the mark on valuable measures

Test misses the mark on valuable measures

17 July 2015

The Age, 16 July 2015.  – NAPLAN only measures small fragments of a child's achievements and it cannot be used as a diagnostic tool to inform educators of areas of weakness that need to be fixed.  Read the letter...more»

Robot grading of NAPLAN tests will further reduce their effectiveness

Robot grading of NAPLAN tests will further reduce their effectiveness

6 June 2015

The Age, 12 May 2015.  – Winning the NAPLAN lottery is meaningless.  It's about hoop jumping and not a lot more.  Read the article here...more»

What do standardised tests actually test?

What do standardised tests actually test?

7 August 2014

Marion Brady, The Washington Post, 5 August 2014.   – There's a common but mistaken belief that tests measure a quantity - the amount of information taught, minus the amount not learned or learned and forgotten.  But what matters most isn't what teachers say, it's what the kids do. You can't standardise instruction and...more»

Is opting out of testing just selfish individualism?

Is opting out of testing just selfish individualism?

11 April 2014

Margaret Clark, April 2014.   –  Let me reassure parents who are concerned about our high stakes NAPLAN testing regime.  Opting out of having your child participate in these tests is much more of a community act than deciding to send your child to an elite school.  Read the article here [Comment:...more»